On the other hand, the CoreHT with its Core i5 2520M/HD Graphics 3000 is only a fraction faster than what we saw from the Vision 3D, providing rather poor performance. The CoreHT does much better when testing with Povray and this time it is just a hair slower than the AMD A8-3850. Furthermore, it provided a noticeable performance improvement over the Vision 3D. The CoreHT provided strong CPU performance in CINEBENCH R11.5 thanks to the Core i5 2520M, but again, Sandy Bridge’s graphics core is no match for Llano’s embedded engine or the discrete Nvidia GeForce GT 425M, making the CoreHT much slower than the Vision 3D.
